[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f324e46-f05c-42d7-9599-a43de7be17dc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 12:16:34 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Phi Nguyen <phind.uet@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
kpsingh@...nel.org, Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>, Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
memxor@...il.com, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
syzbot+989efe781c74de1ddb54@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: drop skbs in napi->rx_list when removing the napi
context.
On 8/12/21 9:17 PM, Phi Nguyen wrote:
> On 8/12/2021 3:07 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Also I object to this fix.
>>
>> If packets have been stored temporarily in GRO, they should be
>> released at some point,
>> normally at the end of a napi poll.
>>
>> By released, I mean that these packets should reach the upper stack,
>> instead of being dropped without
>> any notification.
>>
>> It seems a call to gro_normal_list() is missing somewhere.
>>
>> Can you find where ?
>>
>> Thanks !
>> H Eric,
>
> I think the location that should have a call to gro_normal_list() is __netif_napi_del(). Let say, if the driver call a function that lead to gro_normal_one(), and add a skb to the rx_list while the napi poll is not scheduled, and the driver remove the napi context before a napi poll could be triggered, then the added skb will be lost.
>
> Actually, this was the first solution that I tried with syzbot (It passed the test too).
> Best regards,
> Phi
I think the real bug is in drivers/net/tun.c
It can call napi_gro_frags() and I do not see corresponding napi_complete()
This seems completely bogus.
Your patch only works around one the many bugs caused by
commit 90e33d45940793def6f773b2d528e9f3c84ffdc7 tun: enable napi_gro_frags() for TUN/TAP driver
I suggest not adding your patch, because we should fix the root cause.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists