[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52e21dcc-3b0d-3c87-deb4-18ead45fed24@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 15:17:14 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] perf/x86: Add new event for AUX output counter
index
On 5/07/21 10:24 am, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 04:17:30PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> index e28892270c58..7a7c3b18acec 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> @@ -2400,6 +2400,12 @@ static void intel_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
>> intel_pmu_pebs_disable(event);
>> }
>>
>> +static void intel_pmu_assign_event(struct perf_event *event, int idx)
>> +{
>> + if (is_pebs_pt(event))
>> + perf_report_aux_output_id(event, idx);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void intel_pmu_del_event(struct perf_event *event)
>> {
>> if (needs_branch_stack(event))
>> @@ -4596,6 +4602,7 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu intel_pmu = {
>> .enable_all = intel_pmu_enable_all,
>> .enable = intel_pmu_enable_event,
>> .disable = intel_pmu_disable_event,
>> + .assign = intel_pmu_assign_event,
>> .add = intel_pmu_add_event,
>> .del = intel_pmu_del_event,
>> .read = intel_pmu_read_event,
>
> How about we only set that method (or clear it again) when
> intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available ?
I've finally got back to this, but now, in the case of hybrids,
there seems to be more than one intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available.
Any suggestions?
>
> Other than that, this looks good to me.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists