[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad6d8025-977c-9ff2-81ff-a417df48231c@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 14:59:56 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add thermal fan control to
rockpro64
On 30/07/2021 17:17, Peter Geis wrote:
> The rockpro64 had a fan node since
> commit 5882d65c1691 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PWM fan for RockPro64")
> however it was never tied into the thermal driver for automatic control.
>
> Add the links to the thermal node to permit the kernel to handle this
> automatically.
> Borrowed from the (rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi).
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Changelog:
> v3:
> Removed the gpu nodes to prevent in-fighting (thanks Robin!)
>
> v2:
> Adjusted fan setpoints for less noise
>
> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> index 6bff8db7d33e..83db4ca67334 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ diy_led: led-1 {
>
> fan: pwm-fan {
> compatible = "pwm-fan";
> + cooling-levels = <0 100 150 200 255>;
> #cooling-cells = <2>;
> fan-supply = <&vcc12v_dcin>;
> pwms = <&pwm1 0 50000 0>;
> @@ -245,6 +246,34 @@ &cpu_b1 {
> cpu-supply = <&vdd_cpu_b>;
> };
>
> +&cpu_thermal {
> + trips {
> + cpu_warm: cpu_warm {
> + temperature = <55000>;
> + hysteresis = <2000>;
> + type = "active";
> + };
> +
> + cpu_hot: cpu_hot {
> + temperature = <65000>;
> + hysteresis = <2000>;
> + type = "active";
> + };
> + };
> +
Why two trip points ?
Why not one functioning temperature and no lower / upper limits for the
cooling maps ?
> + cooling-maps {
> + map2 {
> + trip = <&cpu_warm>;
> + cooling-device = <&fan THERMAL_NO_LIMIT 1>;
> + };
> +
> + map3 {
> + trip = <&cpu_hot>;
> + cooling-device = <&fan 2 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> &emmc_phy {
> status = "okay";
> };
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists