linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 03/11] bpf: Inherit expanded/patched seen count from old aux data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:07:10 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@....de>,
        Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 03/11] bpf: Inherit expanded/patched seen count from old aux data

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

commit d203b0fd863a2261e5d00b97f3d060c4c2a6db71 upstream.

Instead of relying on current env->pass_cnt, use the seen count from the
old aux data in adjust_insn_aux_data(), and expand it to the new range of
patched instructions. This change is valid given we always expand 1:n
with n>=1, so what applies to the old/original instruction needs to apply
for the replacement as well.

Not relying on env->pass_cnt is a prerequisite for a later change where we
want to avoid marking an instruction seen when verified under speculative
execution path.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@....de>
Reviewed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
[OP: - declare old_data as bool instead of u32 (struct bpf_insn_aux_data.seen
     is bool in 5.4)
     - adjusted context for 4.19]
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5690,6 +5690,7 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct b
 				u32 off, u32 cnt)
 {
 	struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, *old_data = env->insn_aux_data;
+	bool old_seen = old_data[off].seen;
 	int i;
 
 	if (cnt == 1)
@@ -5701,8 +5702,10 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct b
 	memcpy(new_data, old_data, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * off);
 	memcpy(new_data + off + cnt - 1, old_data + off,
 	       sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * (prog_len - off - cnt + 1));
-	for (i = off; i < off + cnt - 1; i++)
-		new_data[i].seen = true;
+	for (i = off; i < off + cnt - 1; i++) {
+		/* Expand insni[off]'s seen count to the patched range. */
+		new_data[i].seen = old_seen;
+	}
 	env->insn_aux_data = new_data;
 	vfree(old_data);
 	return 0;