linux-kernel - Re: [Internet]Re: [PATCH v5] arm pl011 serial: support multi-irq request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YRaMQL+YOaky+x9Q@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:14:08 +0200
From:   gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>,
        tombinfan(范兵) <tombinfan@...cent.com>,
        Bing Fan <hptsfb@...il.com>,
        linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Internet]Re: [PATCH v5] arm pl011 serial: support multi-irq
 request

On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 04:09:50PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-08-13 16:01, gregkh wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:42:52AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 8/12/2021 11:32 PM, tombinfan(范兵) wrote:
> > > > hello,
> > > > 
> > > > I have sent the modified patch to the following mailboxes. THX
> > > > 
> > > > gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
> > > > linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
> > > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the pointer. It is good to get some reviews from Arm
> > > people in the first place, so we don't break Arm like this.
> > > 
> > > Anyway, for anyone who might be watching, here is the new patch,
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/1628825490-18937-1-git-send-email-hptsfb@gmail.com/
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, I saw Greg mentioned that it was not based on
> > > tty-next, so not something I can apply easily on linux-next here
> > > as well.
> > 
> > That is because the code in tty-next (and linux-next), looks to already
> > do exactly what you submitted, right?
> > 
> > So is this working now for everyone in linux-next?
> 
> AFAICS commit b0819465be8b in linux-next still results in
> amba_device-specific code being called from sbsa_uart_startup() and
> sbsa_uart_shutdown(), which is what blows up.

Ick,  ok, can someone send me a revert with this information in it
please?

thanks,

greg k-h