linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the irqchip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210813140437.79035655@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 13 Aug 2021 14:04:37 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the irqchip tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:

  kernel/irq/chip.c

between commit:

  56707bb845f5 ("genirq, irq-gic-v3: Make NMI flow handlers use ->irq_ack() if available")

from the irqchip tree and commit:

  ef62bf7e92d8 ("irq: abstract irqaction handler invocation")

from the rcu tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc kernel/irq/chip.c
index 1b1171113437,804c2791315d..000000000000
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@@ -768,11 -744,6 +768,9 @@@ void handle_nmi(struct irq_desc *desc
  
  	__kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
  
 +	if (chip->irq_ack)
 +		chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data);
 +
- 	trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action);
  	/*
  	 * NMIs cannot be shared, there is only one action.
  	 */
@@@ -1050,13 -954,7 +1044,10 @@@ void handle_percpu_devid_nmi(struct irq
  
  	__kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
  
 +	if (chip->irq_ack)
 +		chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data);
 +
- 	trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action);
- 	res = action->handler(irq, raw_cpu_ptr(action->percpu_dev_id));
- 	trace_irq_handler_exit(irq, action, res);
+ 	handle_irqaction_percpu_devid(irq, action);
  
  	if (chip->irq_eoi)
  		chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped