[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e741216-d6e7-c40c-f257-242cd2fea302@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:45:23 +0100
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
iommu <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use command queue batching helpers
to improve performance
On 13/08/2021 17:01, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> index 235f9bdaeaf223b..c81cd929047f573 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> @@ -1747,15 +1747,16 @@ static int arm_smmu_atc_inv_master(struct
>> arm_smmu_master *master)
>> {
>> int i;
>> struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent cmd;
>> + struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch cmds = {};
>
> BTW, it looks like this has crossed over with John's patch removing these.
It is only called from arm_smmu_disable_ats(), so not hot-path by the
look for it. Or who even has ats HW ...?
But it should be at least cleaned-up for consistency. Leizhen?
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists