[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c5443e1-1168-078f-89d2-70275706be6a@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 12:22:50 -0500
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper
function
On 8/13/21 11:59 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> This patch series provides a generic helper function, prot_guest_has(),
> to replace the sme_active(), sev_active(), sev_es_active() and
> mem_encrypt_active() functions.
>
> It is expected that as new protected virtualization technologies are
> added to the kernel, they can all be covered by a single function call
> instead of a collection of specific function calls all called from the
> same locations.
>
> The powerpc and s390 patches have been compile tested only. Can the
> folks copied on this series verify that nothing breaks for them.
There are some patches related to PPC that added new calls to the
mem_encrypt_active() function that are not yet in the tip tree. After the
merge window, I'll need to send a v3 with those additional changes before
this series can be applied.
Thanks,
Tom
Powered by blists - more mailing lists