[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRawjOas2FixC5Kp@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 12:49:00 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: Chester Lin <clin@...e.com>, s32@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Stefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@...tec.de>,
Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@...icam.com>,
Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>,
Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
catalin-dan.udma@....com, bogdan.hamciuc@....com,
bogdan.folea@....com, ciprianmarian.costea@....com,
radu-nicolae.pirea@....com, ghennadi.procopciuc@....com,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"Ivan T . Ivanov" <iivanov@...e.de>, "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add NXP S32G2 boards
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 05:46:16PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hello Rob and NXP,
>
> On 05.08.21 08:54, Chester Lin wrote:
> > Add bindings for S32G2's evaluation board (S32G-VNP-EVB) and reference
> > design 2 board ( S32G-VNP-RDB2).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chester Lin <clin@...e.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > index e2097011c4b0..3914aa09e503 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > @@ -983,6 +983,13 @@ properties:
> > - const: solidrun,lx2160a-cex7
> > - const: fsl,lx2160a
> >
> > + - description: S32G2 based Boards
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - fsl,s32g274a-evb
> > + - fsl,s32g274a-rdb2
>
> @Rob: Should for new boards the description: syntax be used also for
> enums? Or just at SoC level, and for board enums still traditional #
> comments?
It's up to how the platform wants to do it.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists