[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465daabf002e098f0a24cf07f72a69d7e20c7440.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 20:19:36 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 39/64] mac80211: Use memset_after() to clear tx status
On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 09:08 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > The common helper should also clear ack_signal, but that was broken by
> > commit e3e1a0bcb3f1 ("mac80211: reduce IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES"), because
> > that commit changed the order of the fields and updated carl9170 and p54
> > properly but not the common helper...
>
> It looks like p54 actually uses the rates, which is why it does this
> manually. I can't see why carl9170 does this manually, though.
mac80211 also uses the rates later again on status reporting, it just
expects the # of attempts to be filled etc. I haven't looked at
carl9170, but I would expect it to do something there and do it
correctly, even though old it's a well-written driver and uses mac80211
rate control, so this would need to be correct for decent performance.
But I guess it could be that the helper could be used because the rates
were already handed to the firmware, and the code was just copy/pasted
from p54 (the drivers were, IIRC, developed by the same folks)
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists