[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7323d825-f596-223b-a063-7539a6a57107@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 02:35:53 +0800
From: Phi Nguyen <phind.uet@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: jirislaby@...nel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+97388eb9d31b997fe1d0@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Fix data race between tiocsti() and flush_to_ldisc()
On 8/13/2021 3:33 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@...il.com>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+97388eb9d31b997fe1d0@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
>> index e8532006e960..746fe13a2054 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
>> @@ -2307,8 +2307,10 @@ static int tiocsti(struct tty_struct *tty, char __user *p)
>> ld = tty_ldisc_ref_wait(tty);
>> if (!ld)
>> return -EIO;
>> + tty_buffer_lock_exclusive(tty->port);
>> if (ld->ops->receive_buf)
>> ld->ops->receive_buf(tty, &ch, &mbz, 1);
>> + tty_buffer_unlock_exclusive(tty->port);
>
> Did this fix the syzbot reported issue?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> Yes, this fixed the syzbot reported issue.
The lock is grabbed in flush_to_ldisc() and paste_selection().
Actually, I follow the document in tty_buffer.c, where it say the
callers to receive_buff() other than flush_to_ldisc() need to exclude
the kworker from concurrent use of the line discipline.
And function tiocsti() has the following comment:
/* FIXME: may race normal receive processing */
that why I add lock in this function.
BR,
Phi.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists