[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRbAbHraZjY1dwSG@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 19:56:44 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 035/138] mm/memcg: Use the node id in
mem_cgroup_update_tree()
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 09:06:52PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > By using the node id in mem_cgroup_update_tree(), we can delete
> > soft_limit_tree_from_page() and mem_cgroup_page_nodeinfo(). Saves 42
> > bytes of kernel text on my config.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
>
> Though I wonder if:
>
> > - mz = mem_cgroup_page_nodeinfo(memcg, page);
> > + mz = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
>
> should still have some sort of wrapper function.
I was asked to remove the wrapper function as it didn't provide enough
utility to warrant the indirection.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists