[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B04AD498-8EE3-4D60-8AF1-CF6ED1D6E55C@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 19:44:01 +0000
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: "Macieira, Thiago" <thiago.macieira@...el.com>
CC: "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>, "Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 14/26] x86/arch_prctl: Create
ARCH_SET_STATE_ENABLE/ARCH_GET_STATE_ENABLE
On Aug 9, 2021, at 17:57, Bae, Chang Seok <chang.seok.bae@...el.com> wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2021, at 16:42, Macieira, Thiago <thiago.macieira@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> This means the corruption can get worse since the rollback code can undo or
>> partially undo the progression of the other ARCH_SET_STATE_ENABLE.
>
> Maybe something like this can help here to ensure a valid rollback.
After reconsidering this, I think the group_leader task’s permission value is
reliable. Perhaps, reference group_leader’s everywhere, instead of each
task's. I think that way resolves the corner case in a simple way.
Thanks,
Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists