[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRccm0lwTkzlxqCX@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 02:30:03 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 040/138] mm/memcg: Convert mem_cgroup_charge() to
take a folio
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:54:05PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > -static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > +static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > gfp_t gfp)
>
> The git/next version also renames this function to charge_memcg(), why? The new
> name doesn't look that internal as the old one. I don't have a strong opinion
> but CCing memcg maintainers who might.
Ah, this is Suren's fault :-)
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210710003626.3549282-2-surenb@google.com/
Renaming it here makes the merge resolution cleaner.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists