[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ikQQbUNdqskxcbbuDDp2zevG8JP5hGzqBPu1rdcgFWiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 18:36:54 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary
more sensibly
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 12:09 AM Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> A while ago I patched fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() to check for endpoints
> against fwnode->secondary if none was found against the primary. It's actually
> better to do this in fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() instead, since that
> function is called by fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() and also directly called
> in a bunch of other places (primarily sensor drivers checking that they have
> endpoints connected during probe). This small series just adds the equivalent
> functionality to fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() and reverts the earlier
> commit.
>
> Resending with +CC linux-acpi
Both patches applied as 5.15 material, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists