linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] staging: r8188eu: refactor rtw_is_cckrates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7a09afdb-5f85-0302-0375-93665e2f3f1a@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Aug 2021 21:36:45 +0200
From:   Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     Larry.Finger@...inger.net, phil@...lpotter.co.uk, martin@...ser.cx,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] staging: r8188eu: refactor
 rtw_is_cckrates_included()

On 8/16/21 6:15 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 14:59 +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
>> On Monday, August 16, 2021 1:54:27 PM CEST Michael Straube wrote:
>>> Refactor function rtw_is_cckrates_included(). Improves readability
>>> and slightly reduces object file size.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> v1 -> v2
>>> Refactored to more compact code as suggested by Joe Perches.
>>>
>>>   drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ieee80211.c | 9 ++++-----
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for redoing the series as suggested by Joe Perches.
>> This is a perfect case where conciseness and readability don't clash and
>> instead the former enhances the latter.
> 
> Perhaps do the whole thing in one go (moving the & 0x7f into the helper
> avoids an early loop exit defect when the rate being indexed is 0x80)
> 

I have sent a new patch that does the refactoring in one go,
so this series is obsolete now. ;)

Regards,
Michael