[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ec05a0b-9499-3bf4-a231-ea53b1cf99ed@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:32:20 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: memory: convert Samsung Exynos DMC to
dtschema
On 16/08/2021 09:53, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 8/13/21 1:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Convert Samsung Exynos5422 SoC frequency and voltage scaling for
>> Dynamic Memory Controller to DT schema format using json-schema.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
>> ---
>> .../memory-controllers/exynos5422-dmc.txt | 84 -----------
>> .../samsung,exynos5422-dmc.yaml | 137 ++++++++++++++++++
>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>
> I'm not an expert in this DT scripts and why it complains. Maybe it
> complains because the "samsung,exynos-ppmu" is defined in the .txt
> file... (?)
> Although, in general looks OK.
>
> Acked-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
I think the warning (triggered by DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m) can be ignored
because it complains about compatible in example which is not present in
the bindings. Usually it means someone wrote example not matching the
bindings (e.g. a typo in compatible) but here it is on purpose.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists