[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210816092140.4yqew2byxpi6a3l3@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:21:40 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [patch V5 00/72] locking, sched: The PREEMPT-RT locking
infrastructure
On 2021-08-15 23:27:35 [+0200], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The series survived internal testing in RT kernels and is part of the upcoming
> v5.14-rc6-rt9 release.
v5.14-rc6-rt10 to be exact, -rt9 was an intermediate release containing
the update to -rc6.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists