linux-kernel - Re: [fscrypt][RFC PATCH] ceph: don't allow changing layout on encrypted files/directories

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e07e5f52bf73c0a9ef1441295f5ff42753d3e29a.camel@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:44:01 -0400
From:   Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To:     Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
Cc:     ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [fscrypt][RFC PATCH] ceph: don't allow changing layout on
 encrypted files/directories

On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 14:03 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Encryption is currently only supported on files/directories with layouts
> where stripe_count=1.  Forbid changing layouts when encryption is involved.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
> ---
> Hi!
> 
> While continuing looking into fscrypt, I realized we're not yet forbidding
> different layouts on encrypted files.  This patch tries to do just that.
> 
> Regarding the setxattr, I've also made a change [1] to the MDS code so that it
> also prevents layouts to be changed.  This should make the changes to
> ceph_sync_setxattr() redundant, but in practice it doesn't because if we encrypt
> a directory and immediately after that we change that directory layout, the MDS
> wouldn't yet have received the fscrypt_auth for that inode.  So... yeah, an
> alternative would be to propagate the fscrypt context immediately after
> encrypting a directory.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/luis-henrix/ceph/commit/601488ae798ecfa5ec81677d1ced02f7dd42aa10
> 
> Cheers,
> --
> Luis
> 
>  fs/ceph/ioctl.c | 4 ++++
>  fs/ceph/xattr.c | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/ioctl.c b/fs/ceph/ioctl.c
> index 477ecc667aee..42abfc564301 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/ioctl.c
> @@ -294,6 +294,10 @@ static long ceph_set_encryption_policy(struct file *file, unsigned long arg)
>  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
>  	struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
>  
> +	/* encrypted directories can't have striped layout */
> +	if (ci->i_layout.stripe_count > 1)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +

Yes, I've been needing to add that for a while. I'm not sure EOPNOTSUPP
is the right error code though. Maybe EINVAL instead?

>  	ret = vet_mds_for_fscrypt(file);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/xattr.c b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> index b175b3029dc0..7921cb34900c 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> @@ -1051,6 +1051,12 @@ static int ceph_sync_setxattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
>  	int op = CEPH_MDS_OP_SETXATTR;
>  	int err;
>  
> +	/* encrypted directories/files can't have their layout changed */
> +	if (IS_ENCRYPTED(inode) &&
> +	    (!strncmp(name, "ceph.file.layout", 16) ||
> +	     !strncmp(name, "ceph.dir.layout", 15)))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +

Yuck.

What might be nicer is to just make ceph_vxattrcb_layout* return an
error when the inode is encrypted? You can return negative error codes
from the ->getxattr_cb ops, and that's probably the better place to
check for this.

>  	if (size > 0) {
>  		/* copy value into pagelist */
>  		pagelist = ceph_pagelist_alloc(GFP_NOFS);
> 
> Cheers,
> --
> Luís

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>