linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 04/96] iio: adc: Fix incorrect exit of for-loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210816125435.087389881@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:01:14 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 04/96] iio: adc: Fix incorrect exit of for-loop

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

commit 5afc1540f13804a31bb704b763308e17688369c5 upstream.

Currently the for-loop that scans for the optimial adc_period iterates
through all the possible adc_period levels because the exit logic in
the loop is inverted. I believe the comparison should be swapped and
the continue replaced with a break to exit the loop at the correct
point.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
Fixes: e08e19c331fb ("iio:adc: add iio driver for Palmas (twl6035/7) gpadc")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730071651.17394-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/iio/adc/palmas_gpadc.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/iio/adc/palmas_gpadc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/palmas_gpadc.c
@@ -654,8 +654,8 @@ static int palmas_adc_wakeup_configure(s
 
 	adc_period = adc->auto_conversion_period;
 	for (i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
-		if (((1000 * (1 << i)) / 32) < adc_period)
-			continue;
+		if (((1000 * (1 << i)) / 32) >= adc_period)
+			break;
 	}
 	if (i > 0)
 		i--;