[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210816125446.041122020@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:01:30 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ammy Yi <ammy.yi@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.13 060/151] perf/x86/intel: Apply mid ACK for small core
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit acade6379930dfa7987f4bd9b26d1a701cc1b542 ]
A warning as below may be occasionally triggered in an ADL machine when
these conditions occur:
- Two perf record commands run one by one. Both record a PEBS event.
- Both runs on small cores.
- They have different adaptive PEBS configuration (PEBS_DATA_CFG).
[ ] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 9874 at arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c:1743 setup_pebs_adaptive_sample_data+0x55e/0x5b0
[ ] RIP: 0010:setup_pebs_adaptive_sample_data+0x55e/0x5b0
[ ] Call Trace:
[ ] <NMI>
[ ] intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl+0x48b/0x810
[ ] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x41/0x80
[ ] </NMI>
[ ] __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x2c2/0x3a0
Different from the big core, the small core requires the ACK right
before re-enabling counters in the NMI handler, otherwise a stale PEBS
record may be dumped into the later NMI handler, which trigger the
warning.
Add a new mid_ack flag to track the case. Add all PMI handler bits in
the struct x86_hybrid_pmu to track the bits for different types of
PMUs. Apply mid ACK for the small cores on an Alder Lake machine.
The existing hybrid() macro has a compile error when taking address of
a bit-field variable. Add a new macro hybrid_bit() to get the
bit-field value of a given PMU.
Fixes: f83d2f91d259 ("perf/x86/intel: Add Alder Lake Hybrid support")
Reported-by: Ammy Yi <ammy.yi@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Ammy Yi <ammy.yi@...el.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1627997128-57891-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index d76be3bba11e..511d1f9a9bf8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -2904,24 +2904,28 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
*/
static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+ bool late_ack = hybrid_bit(cpuc->pmu, late_ack);
+ bool mid_ack = hybrid_bit(cpuc->pmu, mid_ack);
int loops;
u64 status;
int handled;
int pmu_enabled;
- cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
-
/*
* Save the PMU state.
* It needs to be restored when leaving the handler.
*/
pmu_enabled = cpuc->enabled;
/*
- * No known reason to not always do late ACK,
- * but just in case do it opt-in.
+ * In general, the early ACK is only applied for old platforms.
+ * For the big core starts from Haswell, the late ACK should be
+ * applied.
+ * For the small core after Tremont, we have to do the ACK right
+ * before re-enabling counters, which is in the middle of the
+ * NMI handler.
*/
- if (!x86_pmu.late_ack)
+ if (!late_ack && !mid_ack)
apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
intel_bts_disable_local();
cpuc->enabled = 0;
@@ -2958,6 +2962,8 @@ again:
goto again;
done:
+ if (mid_ack)
+ apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
/* Only restore PMU state when it's active. See x86_pmu_disable(). */
cpuc->enabled = pmu_enabled;
if (pmu_enabled)
@@ -2969,7 +2975,7 @@ done:
* have been reset. This avoids spurious NMIs on
* Haswell CPUs.
*/
- if (x86_pmu.late_ack)
+ if (late_ack)
apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
return handled;
}
@@ -6123,7 +6129,6 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
static_branch_enable(&perf_is_hybrid);
x86_pmu.num_hybrid_pmus = X86_HYBRID_NUM_PMUS;
- x86_pmu.late_ack = true;
x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = NULL;
x86_pmu.pebs_prec_dist = true;
x86_pmu.pebs_block = true;
@@ -6161,6 +6166,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
pmu = &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[X86_HYBRID_PMU_CORE_IDX];
pmu->name = "cpu_core";
pmu->cpu_type = hybrid_big;
+ pmu->late_ack = true;
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HYBRID_CPU)) {
pmu->num_counters = x86_pmu.num_counters + 2;
pmu->num_counters_fixed = x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed + 1;
@@ -6186,6 +6192,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
pmu = &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[X86_HYBRID_PMU_ATOM_IDX];
pmu->name = "cpu_atom";
pmu->cpu_type = hybrid_small;
+ pmu->mid_ack = true;
pmu->num_counters = x86_pmu.num_counters;
pmu->num_counters_fixed = x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed;
pmu->max_pebs_events = x86_pmu.max_pebs_events;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 2938c902ffbe..e3ac05c97b5e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -656,6 +656,10 @@ struct x86_hybrid_pmu {
struct event_constraint *event_constraints;
struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints;
struct extra_reg *extra_regs;
+
+ unsigned int late_ack :1,
+ mid_ack :1,
+ enabled_ack :1;
};
static __always_inline struct x86_hybrid_pmu *hybrid_pmu(struct pmu *pmu)
@@ -686,6 +690,16 @@ extern struct static_key_false perf_is_hybrid;
__Fp; \
}))
+#define hybrid_bit(_pmu, _field) \
+({ \
+ bool __Fp = x86_pmu._field; \
+ \
+ if (is_hybrid() && (_pmu)) \
+ __Fp = hybrid_pmu(_pmu)->_field; \
+ \
+ __Fp; \
+})
+
enum hybrid_pmu_type {
hybrid_big = 0x40,
hybrid_small = 0x20,
@@ -755,6 +769,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
/* PMI handler bits */
unsigned int late_ack :1,
+ mid_ack :1,
enabled_ack :1;
/*
* sysfs attrs
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists