[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRppqnAqJ1G+4mva@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:35:38 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform: Increase maximum GPIO number for
X86_64
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 03:25:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 4:44 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > By default the 512 GPIOs is a maximum on any x86 platform.
> > With, for example, Intel Tiger Lake-H the SoC based controller
> > occupies up to 480 pins. This leaves only 32 available for
> > GPIO expanders or other drivers, like PMIC. Hence, bump the
> > maximum GPIO number to 1024 for X86_64 and leave 512 for X86_32.
Thanks for review, my answers below.
> > +# The GPIO number here must be sorted by descending number. In case of
> > +# a multiplatform kernel, we just want the highest value required by the
> > +# selected platforms.
> > +config ARCH_NR_GPIO
> > + int
> > + default 1024 if X86_64
> > + default 512 if X86_32
> > + default 0
>
> Wouldn't
>
> default 1024 if X86_64
> default 512
>
> be sufficient?
>
> It's either X86_64 or X86_32 anyway AFAICS.
I guess so.
> > + help
> > + Maximum number of GPIOs in the system.
> > +
> > + If unsure, leave the default value.
Btw, what do you think. do we need comment above and help text here? I copied
these from ARM, but I'm not sure it would be useful on x86 as much.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists