linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: Convert uart.c from IDR to XArray

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YRp9rnCardsCukju@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:01:02 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>
Cc:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
        greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: Convert uart.c from IDR to XArray

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 09:46:08AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 8/14/21 1:11 PM, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > Convert greybus/uart.c from IDR to XArray. The abstract data type XArray
> > is more memory-efficient, parallelisable, and cache friendly. It takes
> > advantage of RCU to perform lookups without locking. Furthermore, IDR is
> > deprecated because XArray has a better (cleaner and more consistent) API.
> 
> I haven't verified the use of the new API (yet) but I have a few
> comments on your patch, below.
> 
> 					-Alex
> 
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
> 
> I'm not sure I'm right about this...  But the actual change you're
> making has nothing to do with what the Intel test robot reported.
> I personally find the "Reported-by" here a little misleading, but
> maybe the "Link" line that gets added will provide explanation.
> 
> Anyway, unless someone else contradicts/corrects me, I'd rather
> not have the "Reported-by" here (despite wanting to provide much
> credit to <lkp@...el.com>...).

You are correct, "Reported-by:" does not make sense here.

thanks,

greg k-h