linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 35/35] mm, slub: convert kmem_cpu_slab protection to local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210817125325.d0ed45d664596d1e80a591d7@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:53:25 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 35/35] mm, slub: convert kmem_cpu_slab protection to
 local_lock

On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:14:58 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:

> Another fixup. Is it too many and should we replace it all with a v5?

Maybe do a full resend when things have settled down and I can at least
check that we match.

What's your confidence level for a 5.15-rc1 merge?  It isn't terribly
well reviewed?