[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <162923125598.25758.7847587189615681611.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 20:14:15 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock raw
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: ebf4c55c1ddbabaea120fe8d48ce25b4f5da93a1
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/ebf4c55c1ddbabaea120fe8d48ce25b4f5da93a1
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 23:28:36 +02:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 19:03:33 +02:00
locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock raw
The wait_lock of mutex is really a low level lock. Convert it to a
raw_spinlock like the wait_lock of rtmutex.
[ mingo: backmerged the test_lockup.c build fix by bigeasy. ]
Co-developed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211304.166863404@linutronix.de
---
include/linux/mutex.h | 4 ++--
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
lib/test_lockup.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
index db33675..0bbc872 100644
--- a/include/linux/mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
*/
struct mutex {
atomic_long_t owner;
- spinlock_t wait_lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t wait_lock;
#ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
struct optimistic_spin_queue osq; /* Spinner MCS lock */
#endif
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ do { \
#define __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \
{ .owner = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0) \
- , .wait_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname.wait_lock) \
+ , .wait_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname.wait_lock) \
, .wait_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(lockname.wait_list) \
__DEBUG_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \
__DEP_MAP_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) }
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index acbe43d..17c194b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void
__mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *key)
{
atomic_long_set(&lock->owner, 0);
- spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock->wait_list);
#ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
osq_lock_init(&lock->osq);
@@ -486,9 +486,9 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
* Uh oh, we raced in fastpath, check if any of the waiters need to
* die or wound us.
*/
- spin_lock(&lock->base.wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&lock->base.wait_lock);
__ww_mutex_check_waiters(&lock->base, ctx);
- spin_unlock(&lock->base.wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&lock->base.wait_lock);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
return 0;
}
- spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
/*
* After waiting to acquire the wait_lock, try again.
*/
@@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
goto err;
}
- spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
schedule_preempt_disabled();
first = __mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter);
@@ -1047,9 +1047,9 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
(first && mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, &waiter)))
break;
- spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
}
- spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
acquired:
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
@@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@ skip_wait:
if (ww_ctx)
ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx);
- spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
preempt_enable();
return 0;
@@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@ err:
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
__mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
err_early_kill:
- spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
preempt_enable();
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
}
}
- spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
debug_mutex_unlock(lock);
if (!list_empty(&lock->wait_list)) {
/* get the first entry from the wait-list: */
@@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
if (owner & MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF)
__mutex_handoff(lock, next);
- spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
}
diff --git a/lib/test_lockup.c b/lib/test_lockup.c
index 864554e..4d93b02 100644
--- a/lib/test_lockup.c
+++ b/lib/test_lockup.c
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int __init test_lockup_init(void)
offsetof(rwlock_t, magic),
RWLOCK_MAGIC) ||
test_magic(lock_mutex_ptr,
- offsetof(struct mutex, wait_lock.rlock.magic),
+ offsetof(struct mutex, wait_lock.magic),
SPINLOCK_MAGIC) ||
test_magic(lock_rwsem_ptr,
offsetof(struct rw_semaphore, wait_lock.magic),
Powered by blists - more mailing lists