[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <162923126522.25758.9579870247472636074.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 20:14:25 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Prepare RT rt_mutex_wake_q for RT locks
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 456cfbc65cd072f4f53936ee5a37eb1447a7d3ba
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/456cfbc65cd072f4f53936ee5a37eb1447a7d3ba
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 23:28:11 +02:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:21:09 +02:00
locking/rtmutex: Prepare RT rt_mutex_wake_q for RT locks
Add an rtlock_task pointer to rt_mutex_wake_q, which allows to handle the RT
specific wakeup for spin/rwlock waiters. The pointer is just consuming 4/8
bytes on the stack so it is provided unconditionaly to avoid #ifdeffery all
over the place.
This cannot use a regular wake_q, because a task can have concurrent wakeups which
would make it miss either lock or the regular wakeups, depending on what gets
queued first, unless task struct gains a separate wake_q_node for this, which
would be overkill, because there can only be a single task which gets woken
up in the spin/rw_lock unlock path.
No functional change for non-RT enabled kernels.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.253614678@linutronix.de
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 5f0d072..8b0d38d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -351,12 +351,26 @@ static __always_inline void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *p)
static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_q_add(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
{
- wake_q_add(&wqh->head, w->task);
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && w->wake_state != TASK_NORMAL) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING))
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(wqh->rtlock_task);
+ get_task_struct(w->task);
+ wqh->rtlock_task = w->task;
+ } else {
+ wake_q_add(&wqh->head, w->task);
+ }
}
static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_up_q(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh)
{
- wake_up_q(&wqh->head);
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && wqh->rtlock_task) {
+ wake_up_state(wqh->rtlock_task, TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT);
+ put_task_struct(wqh->rtlock_task);
+ wqh->rtlock_task = NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (!wake_q_empty(&wqh->head))
+ wake_up_q(&wqh->head);
/* Pairs with preempt_disable() in mark_wakeup_next_waiter() */
preempt_enable();
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
index ff36316..424ee0f 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -42,15 +42,18 @@ struct rt_mutex_waiter {
/**
* rt_wake_q_head - Wrapper around regular wake_q_head to support
* "sleeping" spinlocks on RT
- * @head: The regular wake_q_head for sleeping lock variants
+ * @head: The regular wake_q_head for sleeping lock variants
+ * @rtlock_task: Task pointer for RT lock (spin/rwlock) wakeups
*/
struct rt_wake_q_head {
struct wake_q_head head;
+ struct task_struct *rtlock_task;
};
#define DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(name) \
struct rt_wake_q_head name = { \
.head = WAKE_Q_HEAD_INITIALIZER(name.head), \
+ .rtlock_task = NULL, \
}
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists