linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm, slub: add cpus_read_lock/unlock() for slab_mem_going_offline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:57:10 +0200
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, qiang.zhang@...driver.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slub: add cpus_read_lock/unlock() for
 slab_mem_going_offline_callback()

On 8/16/21 10:04 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.08.21 09:46, qiang.zhang@...driver.com wrote:
>> From: "Qiang.Zhang" <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
>>
>> The flush_all_cpus_locked() should be called with cpus_read_lock/unlock(),
>> ensure flush_cpu_slab() can be executed on schedule_on CPU.
>>
>> Fixes: 1c84f3c91640 ("mm, slub: fix memory and cpu hotplug related lock ordering issues")
> Memory notifiers are getting called from online_pages()/offline_pages(), 
> where we call memory_notify(MEM_GOING_OFFLINE, &arg) under 
> mem_hotplug_begin().
> 
> mem_hotplug_begin() does a cpus_read_lock().

Exactly. Also flush_all_cpus_locked() has a lockdep assert for
cpus_read_lock() which doesn't trigger in testing.

> How does this even work or against which branch is this?
>