linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:ade7854 surround complex defines in parentheses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5d8c6cb42c2ee156027699ab1e5fa5b476188678.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:50:46 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        daniel watson <ozzloy@...llenge-bot.com>
Cc:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:ade7854 surround complex defines in
 parentheses

On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 08:12 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 09:30:38PM -0700, daniel watson wrote:
> > 
> > If this is a false positive from checkpatch, I can submit it as an
> > example to the checkpatch maintainers.  Do you think I should?
> 
> checkpatch is a perl script that does pattern matching, it is really
> hard for it to determine for things like this specific example, that it
> is not needed.
> 
> Try finding other valid checkpatch cleanups if you wish to contribute in
> this way, there are loads of others under drivers/staging/ that should
> be easy to find.

These macros, and several other '#define ADE7854_<FOO> <value>' instances,
are apparently unused and could possibly be removed instead.