linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/3] ptp_ocp: Switch to use module_pci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YRuF5hd0BL/RAEZw@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:48:22 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/3] ptp_ocp: Switch to use
 module_pci_driver() macro

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 02:01:01PM -0700, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 10:30:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 9:15 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 15:27:35 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > Eliminate some boilerplate code by using module_pci_driver() instead of
> > > > init/exit, and, if needed, moving the salient bits from init into probe.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Jonathan has a series in flight which is fixing some of the same issues:
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=530079&state=*
> > >
> > > Please hold off for a day or two so it can get merged, and if you don't
> > > mind double check at that point which of your patches are still needed.
> > 
> > Actually it may be the other way around. Since patch 2 in his series
> > is definitely an unneeded churn here, because my devm conversion will
> > have to effectively revert it.
> > 
> > 
> > > According to patchwork your series does not apply to net-next as of
> > > last night so it'll need a respin anyway.
> > 
> > I hope he will chime in and see what we can do the best.
> 
> I'm going to submit a respin of the last patch, I screwed something
> up from all the various trees I'm using.
> 
> Please update to net-next first - the firat patch in your series
> doesn't make any longer, given the current status.

I'll rebase my stuff on top of net-next and resubmit.

Thanks!


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko