[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d700658f-8466-46c5-5fff-9e65a6a24720@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:47:25 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter H Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] x86/paravirt: Move halt paravirt calls under
CONFIG_PARAVIRT
On 17.08.21 15:39, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>
>
> On 8/17/21 6:28 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> I guess you have been lucky and all users of arch_safe_halt() and halt()
>> are directly or indirectly including asm/paravirt.h by other means.
>>
>> There might be configs where this is not true, though.
>>
>> In any case I believe you should fix your patch to let asm/irqflags.h
>> include asm/paravirt.h for the CONFIG_PARAVIRT case.
>
> Ok. I will include it.
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) && !defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL)
> #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> #endif
>
I don't see a reason to have two "#include <asm/paravirt.h>" lines in
one file. Why don't you use:
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
#include <asm/paravirt.h>
#else
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY___
...
#endif
#endif
#ifndef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL
...
#endif
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3092 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists