linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <66b3b6f1-2ffc-9eca-f7a4-6db7532a2983@amd.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:11:58 -0500
From:   Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of
 prot_guest_has()

On 8/17/21 3:35 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:23AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> Introduce a powerpc version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will
>> be used to replace the powerpc mem_encrypt_active() implementation, so
>> the implementation will initially only support the PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT
>> attribute.
>>
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig     |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..ce55c2c7e534
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/*
>> + * Protected Guest (and Host) Capability checks
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _POWERPC_PROTECTED_GUEST_H
>> +#define _POWERPC_PROTECTED_GUEST_H
>> +
>> +#include <asm/svm.h>
>> +
>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> 
> Same thing here. Pls audit the whole set whether those __ASSEMBLY__
> guards are really needed and remove them if not.

Will do.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Thx.
>