[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRvFr3baKTaJBvBk@debian>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:20:31 +0100
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/98] 5.10.60-rc2 review
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 07:14:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.60 release.
> There are 98 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Aug 2021 17:13:38 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 63 configs -> 1 failed
decstation_r4k_defconfig build failed due to new binutils. Reported at:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YRujeISiIjKF5eAi@debian/
arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/38
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/39
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists