linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YRvpO8Cuk0nAfuVd@slm.duckdns.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 06:52:11 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:50:20PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:40:07AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Ah, that probably isn't the right resolution. The seq_get_buf change needs
> > to be applied to the original mq-deadline.c file. Jens, how do you wanna
> > proceed?
> 
> Unless I'm missing something the pd_stat_fn that is affected was purely
> in the cgroup addition, so this resolution looks fine to me.

Ah, you're right.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun