lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210817170222.GA224912@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 10:02:22 -0700
From:   Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To:     Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com
Subject: Re: SK hynix BC511: warning: nvme nvme0: missing or invalid SUBNQN
 field.

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:53:15PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> [cc: +Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com as it’s a Dell device]
> Am 17.08.21 um 18:16 schrieb Keith Busch:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 05:10:40PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > > On a Dell OptiPlex 7780 AIO/04G47W (BIOS 1.6.3 03/08/2021) Linux 5.10.47
> > > shows the warning below:
> > > 
> > >      $ dmesg | grep nvme
> > >      [    3.015392] nvme 0000:02:00.0: platform quirk: setting simple suspend
> > >      [    3.021861] nvme nvme0: pci function 0000:02:00.0
> > >      [    3.026593] ahci 0000:00:17.0: version 3.0
> > >      [    3.026922] ahci 0000:00:17.0: AHCI 0001.0301 32 slots 1 ports 6 Gbps 0x1 impl SATA mode
> > >      [    3.035020] ahci 0000:00:17.0: flags: 64bit ncq sntf pm clo only pio slum part ems deso sadm sds apst
> > >      [    3.035219] nvme nvme0: missing or invalid SUBNQN field.
> > >      [    3.044518] scsi host0: ahci
> > >      [    3.051632] nvme nvme0: 12/0/0 default/read/poll queues
> > >      [    3.052590] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@...1339000 port 0xd1339100 irq 125
> > >      [    3.058538]  nvme0n1: p1 p2 p3
> > > 
> > > Should it be added to the quirk list in `drivers/nvme/host/pci.c` or is it a
> > > real issues, the manufacturer should fix? If so, do you have SK Hynix
> > > contacts?
> > 
> > It would be great if device makers would be spec compliant, but the
> > driver will continue to work with the device the same whether you add
> > the quirk or not.
> 
> Could you please point me to the NVMe specification section, so I can refer
> to it, when contacting the manufacturer?

In the section for "Identify Controller Data Structure" (section
5.17.2.1, figure 257 in spec version 2.0), the NQN definition says:

  "Support for this field is mandatory if the controller supports revision
  1.2.1 or later"

The driver does confirm the controller's reported revision meets this
requirement before emitting the warning.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ