linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remove scsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <176ce4f2-42c9-bba6-c8f9-70a08faa21b8@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 19:08:48 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC:     <satishkh@...co.com>, <sebaddel@...co.com>, <kartilak@...co.com>,
        <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <hare@...e.de>, <hch@....de>,
        <bvanassche@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remove scsi_cmnd.tag

On 16/08/2021 18:34, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> John,
> 
>> There is no need for scsi_cmnd.tag, so remove it.
> 
> Applied to 5.15/scsi-staging, thanks!
> 

Hi Martin,

As you may have seen, some arm32 build has also broken. My build 
coverage was not good enough, and I don't see a point in me playing 
whack-a-mole with the kernel test robot. So how about revert the final 
patch or even all of them, and I can try get better build coverage and 
then re-post? Or maybe you or Bart have a better idea?

Thanks!