[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjuCQSmpMA8HiGNHx3XVVFwEONQWydH2yrnzoT_ZDksGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 11:17:59 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Sandeep Patil <sspatil@...roid.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [pipe] 3a34b13a88: hackbench.throughput -12.6% regression
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:31 AM Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote:
>
> I know hackbench is not particularly interesting but it's used often
> enough when comparing kernels and patches that commit 3a34b13a88 will be
> a regression magnet.
Fair enough.
And I like that patch anyway because of how it makes that EPOLLET
behaviour much more explicit, so I just committed it.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists