linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] blk-mq: Relocate shared sbitmap resize in blk_mq_update_nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YRyDWxgxOJSYhpDy@T590>
Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 11:49:47 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kashyap.desai@...adcom.com,
        hare@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] blk-mq: Relocate shared sbitmap resize in
 blk_mq_update_nr_requests()

On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 10:29:30PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> For shared sbitmap, if the call to blk_mq_tag_update_depth() was
> successful for any hctx when hctx->sched_tags is not set, then it would be
> successful for all (due to nature in which blk_mq_tag_update_depth()
> fails).
> 
> As such, there is no need to call blk_mq_tag_resize_shared_sbitmap() for
> each hctx. So relocate the call until after the hctx iteration under the
> !q->elevator check, which is equivalent (to !hctx->sched_tags).
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>

-- 
Ming