[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b2a80c1-9743-e633-6257-ede94c8a274c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 07:12:04 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Lucas Stach <dev@...xeye.de>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/34] opp: Add dev_pm_opp_sync() helper
18.08.2021 06:55, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> On 17-08-21, 18:49, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 17.08.2021 10:55, Viresh Kumar пишет:
>> ...
>>>> +int dev_pm_opp_sync(struct device *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct opp_table *opp_table;
>>>> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Device may not have OPP table */
>>>> + opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(opp_table))
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!_get_opp_count(opp_table))
>>>> + goto put_table;
>>>> +
>>>> + opp = _find_current_opp(dev, opp_table);
>>>> + ret = _set_opp(dev, opp_table, opp, opp->rate);
>>>
>>> And I am not sure how this will end up working, since new OPP will be
>>> equal to old one. Since I see you call this from resume() at many
>>> places.
>>
>> Initially OPP table is "uninitialized" and opp_table->enabled=false,
>> hence the first sync always works even if OPP is equal to old one. Once
>> OPP has been synced, all further syncs are NO-OPs, hence it doesn't
>> matter how many times syncing is called.
>>
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.14-rc6/source/drivers/opp/core.c#L1012
>
> Right, but how will this work from Resume ? Won't that be a no-op ?
The first resume initializes the OPP state on sync, all further syncs on
resume are no-ops.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists