linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: correct parent irqspec translation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5be25c9710b7706cff91f1db71f9e25e@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 10:56:18 +0530
From:   skakit@...eaurora.org
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
        Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: correct parent irqspec
 translation

On 2021-08-18 00:45, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting skakit@...eaurora.org (2021-08-17 02:06:42)
>> On 2021-08-17 02:38, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> >
>> > Are there any boards supported upstream that have a gpio block that
>> > isn't at 0xc000?
>> 
>> yes, all the pmics used in sm8350-mtp.dts board have gpio block at
>> addresses different than 0xc000.
>> 
> 
> So maybe
> 
> Fixes: f67cc6a91d88 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350-mtp: Add PMICs")
> 
> is appropriate then?

This patch is actually fixing the pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c driver.
So, I think we should add

Fixes: ca69e2d165eb ("qcom: spmi-gpio: add support for hierarchical IRQ 
chip")