linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] can: netlink: add interface for CAN-FD Transmitter Delay Compensation (TDC)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZ6RqLj94UU_b8dDAzinVsLaV6pBR-cWbHmjwGhx3vfWiKt_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 17:08:51 +0900
From:   Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-can <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stefan Mätje <Stefan.Maetje@....eu>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] can: netlink: add interface for CAN-FD Transmitter
 Delay Compensation (TDC)

On Wed 18 Aug 2021 at 04:55, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> On 15.08.2021 12:32:46, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> > +static int can_tdc_changelink(struct net_device *dev, const struct nlattr *nla,
> > +                           struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > +     struct nlattr *tb_tdc[IFLA_CAN_TDC_MAX + 1];
> > +     struct can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +     struct can_tdc *tdc = &priv->tdc;
> > +     const struct can_tdc_const *tdc_const = priv->tdc_const;
> > +     int err;
> > +
> > +     if (!tdc_const || !can_tdc_is_enabled(priv))
> > +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > +     if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
> > +             return -EBUSY;
> > +
> > +     err = nla_parse_nested(tb_tdc, IFLA_CAN_TDC_MAX, nla,
> > +                            can_tdc_policy, extack);
> > +     if (err)
> > +             return err;
> > +
> > +     if (tb_tdc[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCV]) {
> > +             u32 tdcv = nla_get_u32(tb_tdc[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCV]);
> > +
> > +             if (tdcv < tdc_const->tdcv_min || tdcv > tdc_const->tdcv_max)
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +             tdc->tdcv = tdcv;
>
> You have to assign to a temporary struct first, and set the priv->tdc
> after complete validation, otherwise you end up with inconsistent
> values.

Actually, copying the temporary structure to priv->tdc is not an
atomic operation. Here, you are only reducing the window, not
closing it.

> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (tb_tdc[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCO]) {
> > +             u32 tdco = nla_get_u32(tb_tdc[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCO]);
> > +
> > +             if (tdco < tdc_const->tdco_min || tdco > tdc_const->tdco_max)
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +             tdc->tdco = tdco;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (tb_tdc[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCF]) {
> > +             u32 tdcf = nla_get_u32(tb_tdc[IFLA_CAN_TDC_TDCF]);
> > +
> > +             if (tdcf < tdc_const->tdcf_min || tdcf > tdc_const->tdcf_max)
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +             tdc->tdcf = tdcf;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
>
> To reproduce (ip pseudo-code only :D ):
>
> ip down
> ip up tdc-mode manual tdco 111 tdcv 33  # 111 is out of range, 33 is valid
> ip down
> ip up                                   # results in tdco=0 tdcv=33 mode=manual

I do not think that this PoC would work because, thankfully, the
netlink interface uses a mutex to prevent this issue from
occurring.

That mutex is defined in:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/net/core/rtnetlink.c#L68

Each time a netlink message is sent to the kernel, it would be
dispatched by rtnetlink_rcv_msg() which will make sure to lock
the mutex before doing so:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/net/core/rtnetlink.c#L5551

A funny note is that because the mutex is global, if you run two
ip command in a row:

| ip link set can0 type can bitrate 500000
| ip link set can1 up

the second one will wait for the first one to finish even if it
is on a different network device.

To conclude, I do not think this needs to be fixed.


Yours sincerely,
Vincent