linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Make use of non-dynamic dmabuf in RDMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKMK7uGZ_eX+XfYJU6EkKEOVrHz3q6QMxaEbyyD3_1iqj9YSjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 11:34:51 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>
Cc:     Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...ana.ai>,
        Tomer Tayar <ttayar@...ana.ai>,
        Yossi Leybovich <sleybo@...zon.com>,
        Alexander Matushevsky <matua@...zon.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
        Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Make use of non-dynamic dmabuf in RDMA

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 9:45 AM Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Currently, the RDMA subsystem can only work with dynamic dmabuf
> attachments, which requires the RDMA device to support on-demand-paging
> (ODP) which is not common on most devices (only supported by mlx5).
>
> While the dynamic requirement makes sense for certain GPUs, some devices
> (such as habanalabs) have device memory that is always "pinned" and do
> not need/use the move_notify operation.
>
> The motivation of this RFC is to use habanalabs as the dmabuf exporter,
> and EFA as the importer to allow for peer2peer access through libibverbs.
>
> This draft patch changes the dmabuf driver to differentiate between
> static/dynamic attachments by looking at the move_notify op instead of
> the importer_ops struct, and allowing the peer2peer flag to be enabled
> in case of a static exporter.
>
> Thanks
>
> Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>

Given that habanalabs dma-buf support is very firmly in limbo (at
least it's not yet in linux-next or anywhere else) I think you want to
solve that problem first before we tackle the additional issue of
making p2p work without dynamic dma-buf. Without that it just doesn't
make a lot of sense really to talk about solutions here.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c             | 5 +++--
>  drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c | 2 +-
>  include/linux/dma-buf.h               | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index 511fe0d217a0..e3faad8f492c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -727,7 +727,8 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>         if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !dev))
>                 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> -       if (WARN_ON(importer_ops && !importer_ops->move_notify))
> +       if (WARN_ON(importer_ops && !importer_ops->move_notify &&
> +                   dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf)))
>                 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
>         attach = kzalloc(sizeof(*attach), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1048,7 +1049,7 @@ void dma_buf_move_notify(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>         dma_resv_assert_held(dmabuf->resv);
>
>         list_for_each_entry(attach, &dmabuf->attachments, node)
> -               if (attach->importer_ops)
> +               if (attach->importer_ops && attach->importer_ops->move_notify)
>                         attach->importer_ops->move_notify(attach);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_move_notify);
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c
> index c6e875619fac..c502ae828bd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ struct ib_umem_dmabuf *ib_umem_dmabuf_get(struct ib_device *device,
>         if (check_add_overflow(offset, (unsigned long)size, &end))
>                 return ret;
>
> -       if (unlikely(!ops || !ops->move_notify))
> +       if (unlikely(!ops))
>                 return ret;
>
>         dmabuf = dma_buf_get(fd);
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> index efdc56b9d95f..4b2e99012cb1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static inline bool dma_buf_is_dynamic(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>  static inline bool
>  dma_buf_attachment_is_dynamic(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
>  {
> -       return !!attach->importer_ops;
> +       return !!attach->importer_ops->move_notify;
>  }
>
>  struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> --
> 2.32.0
>


-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch