lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 13:00:13 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
CC:     <axboe@...nel.dk>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>, <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] blk-mq: Pass driver tags to
 blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping()

>>   
>> @@ -2346,8 +2345,11 @@ static void blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>>   void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
>>   		     unsigned int hctx_idx)
>>   {
>> +	struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags;
>>   	struct page *page;
>>   
>> +		drv_tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];
> 

Hi Ming,

> Indent.

That's intentional, as we have from later patch:

void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags 
*tags, unsigned int hctx_idx)
{
	struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags;
	struct page *page;

+	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(set->flags))
+		drv_tags = set->shared_sbitmap_tags;
+	else
		drv_tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];

	...

	blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(drv_tags, tags);

}

And it's just nice to not re-indent later.

> 
>> +
>>   	if (tags->static_rqs && set->ops->exit_request) {
>>   		int i;
>>   
>> @@ -2361,7 +2363,7 @@ void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(set, tags, hctx_idx);
>> +	blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(drv_tags, tags);
> 
> Maybe you can pass set->tags[hctx_idx] directly since there is only one
> reference on it.
> 

Again, intentional for similar reason, as above.

Thanks,
John

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ