[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210818141051.36320-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:10:51 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
Jon Lin <jon.lin@...k-chips.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] spi: rockchip-sfc: Fix assigned but never used return error codes
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Currently there are two places where the error return variable ret is
being assigned -ETIMEDOUT on timeout errors and this value is not
being returned. Fix this by returning -ETIMEDOUT rather than redundantly
assiging it to ret.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Fixes: 0b89fc0a367e ("spi: rockchip-sfc: add rockchip serial flash controller")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c
index 7c4d47fe80c2..827e205c5340 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int rockchip_sfc_wait_txfifo_ready(struct rockchip_sfc *sfc, u32 timeout_
if (ret) {
dev_dbg(sfc->dev, "sfc wait tx fifo timeout\n");
- ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
return (status & SFC_FSR_TXLV_MASK) >> SFC_FSR_TXLV_SHIFT;
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int rockchip_sfc_wait_rxfifo_ready(struct rockchip_sfc *sfc, u32 timeout_
if (ret) {
dev_dbg(sfc->dev, "sfc wait rx fifo timeout\n");
- ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
return (status & SFC_FSR_RXLV_MASK) >> SFC_FSR_RXLV_SHIFT;
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists