[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210818163114.7f45646e@p-imbrenda>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:31:14 +0200
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] KVM: s390: Introduce kvm_s390_get_gfn_end()
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 21:33:23 +0200
"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name> wrote:
> From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
>
> And use it where s390 code would just access the memslot with the highest
> gfn directly.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 +-
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 4 +---
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 6b3f05086fae..9c3a85793ba4 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -2006,7 +2006,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_cmma(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_cmma_log *args,
> if (!ms)
> return 0;
> next_gfn = kvm_s390_next_dirty_cmma(slots, cur_gfn + 1);
> - mem_end = slots->memslots[0].base_gfn + slots->memslots[0].npages;
> + mem_end = kvm_s390_get_gfn_end(slots);
>
> while (args->count < bufsize) {
> hva = gfn_to_hva(kvm, cur_gfn);
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
> index 9fad25109b0d..5787b12aff7e 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
> @@ -208,6 +208,18 @@ static inline int kvm_s390_user_cpu_state_ctrl(struct kvm *kvm)
> return kvm->arch.user_cpu_state_ctrl != 0;
> }
>
> +/* get the end gfn of the last (highest gfn) memslot */
> +static inline unsigned long kvm_s390_get_gfn_end(struct kvm_memslots *slots)
> +{
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *ms;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!slots->used_slots))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ms = slots->memslots;
> + return ms->base_gfn + ms->npages;
> +}
> +
> /* implemented in pv.c */
> int kvm_s390_pv_destroy_cpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc);
> int kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc);
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> index c8841f476e91..e51cccfded25 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> @@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ static int kvm_s390_pv_alloc_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> unsigned long base = uv_info.guest_base_stor_len;
> unsigned long virt = uv_info.guest_virt_var_stor_len;
> unsigned long npages = 0, vlen = 0;
> - struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
>
> kvm->arch.pv.stor_var = NULL;
> kvm->arch.pv.stor_base = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT, get_order(base));
> @@ -131,8 +130,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_pv_alloc_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> * Slots are sorted by GFN
> */
> mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> - memslot = kvm_memslots(kvm)->memslots;
> - npages = memslot->base_gfn + memslot->npages;
> + npages = kvm_s390_get_gfn_end(kvm_memslots(kvm));
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>
> kvm->arch.pv.guest_len = npages * PAGE_SIZE;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists