linux-kernel - Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH][RFC] sched/cpuacct: Fix cpuacct charge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210818153339.a7kz4irqbzk32pyi@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 11:33:39 -0400
From:   Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
To:     "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "juri.lelli@...hat.com" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        "vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        "dietmar.eggemann@....com" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "bsegall@...gle.com" <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        "mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
        "bristot@...hat.com" <bristot@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "songmuchun@...edance.com" <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH][RFC]
 sched/cpuacct: Fix cpuacct charge

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:55:08AM +0000, Li,Rongqing wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c index
> > > 893eece..48b117e 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
> > > @@ -340,7 +340,12 @@ void cpuacct_charge(struct task_struct *tsk, u64
> > > cputime)  {
> > >         struct cpuacct *ca;
> > >         int index = CPUACCT_STAT_SYSTEM;
> > > -       struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs() ? : task_pt_regs(tsk);
> > > +       struct pt_regs *regs;
> > > +
> > > +       if (task_cpu(tsk) == raw_smp_processor_id())
> > > +               regs = get_irq_regs() ? : task_pt_regs(tsk);
> > > +       else
> > > +               regs = task_pt_regs(tsk);
> > >
> > >         if (regs && user_mode(regs))
> > >                 index = CPUACCT_STAT_USER;
> > 
> > It still suffers from task_pt_regs().
> > 
> > Why not make cpuacct use cgroup2's approach?  Remember only delta_exec
> > here, then on reading cpuacct.usage_*, use cputime_adjust() to scale the
> > user/sys from cpuacct_account_field().
> > 
> 
> I think your suggestion is reasonable, Could you send a patch

I'll leave that to someone else, got other things going on for now.