linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] s390/vfio-ap: do not open code locks for VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 17:59:51 +0200
From:   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>, alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        cohuck@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com,
        jgg@...dia.com, kwankhede@...dia.com, david@...hat.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] s390/vfio-ap: do not open code locks for
 VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM notification

On 02.08.21 18:32, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/2/21 9:53 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:10:26 -0400
>> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> PING!
>>>
>>> This patch will pre-req version 17 of a patch series I have waiting in
>>> the wings,
>>> so I'd like to get this one merged ASAP. In particular, if a KVM
>>> maintainer can
>>> take a look at the comments concerning the taking of the kvm->lock
>>> before the
>>> matrix_mdev->lock it would be greatly appreciated. Those comments begin with
>>> Message ID <20210727004329.3bcc7d4f.pasic@...ux.ibm.com> from Halil Pasic.
>> As far as I'm concerned, we can move forward with this. Was this
>> supposed to go in via Alex's tree?
> 
> I am not certain, Christian queued the previous patches related to
> this on:
> 
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/log/?h=fixes
> 
> Jason G., since this will need to be integrated with your other patches,
> where should this be queued?


This previous patch (s390/vfio-ap: clean up mdev resources when remove callback invoked) is
already in master.
Can you respin the series with all Acks and RBs?

Alex, can you then take these 2 patches via your tree? Thanks

Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
for this series.