lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <162940023650.48070.9595577624316730352.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 19 Aug 2021 20:22:08 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: uniphier: make arrays mul and div static const, makes object smaller

On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:17:46 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> Don't populate the arrays mul and div on the stack but instead make them
> static const. Makes the object code smaller by 4 bytes.
> 
> Before:
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>   16226    4984      64   21274    531a ./sound/soc/uniphier/aio-cpu.o
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: uniphier: make arrays mul and div static const, makes object smaller
      commit: 5d925d9823aaf18d55fab784bd4ef11f80fe1099

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ