lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67f6596f54fd2ea168d71d0747ea4a521dda5384.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Aug 2021 08:06:48 +0300
From:   Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Minor regulator documentation fixes.


On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 13:17 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 07:18:19AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > The newly added regulator ramp-delay specifiers in regulator desc
> > lacked the documentation. Add some. Also fix a typo.
> 
> This should've been two patches.

I was thinking of that. I thought that it made less of a hassle with
single patch. After all, both changes were doc updates - and I didn't
think the typofix warranted backport or a Fixed tag.

Could you please educate me & explain why would you have preferred two
patches? (I see you any ways applied this so I guess there's no need to
split & resend - thanks).

Best Regards
	Matti

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ