[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b14bc147-d39c-6f55-cc0e-7b2de92d23b1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 08:08:10 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>, nic_swsd@...ltek.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] r8169: Implement dynamic ASPM mechanism
for recent 1.0/2.5Gbps Realtek NICs
On 19.08.2021 07:45, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> The latest Realtek vendor driver and its Windows driver implements a
> feature called "dynamic ASPM" which can improve performance on it's
> ethernet NICs.
>
This statement would need a proof. Which performance improvement
did you measure? And why should performance improve?
On mainline ASPM is disabled, therefore I don't think we can see
a performance improvement. More the opposite in the scenario
I described: If traffic starts and there's a congestion in the chip,
then it may take a second until ASPM gets disabled. This may hit
performance.
> Heiner Kallweit pointed out the potential root cause can be that the
> buffer is to small for its ASPM exit latency.
>
> So bring the dynamic ASPM to r8169 so we can have both nice performance
> and powersaving at the same time.
>
> v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210812155341.817031-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/
>
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210803152823.515849-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/
>
> Kai-Heng Feng (3):
> r8169: Implement dynamic ASPM mechanism
> PCI/ASPM: Introduce a new helper to report ASPM support status
> r8169: Enable ASPM for selected NICs
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 11 ++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 2 +
> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
This series is meant for your downstream kernel only, and posted here to
get feedback. Therefore it should be annotated as RFC, not that it gets
applied accidentally.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists