[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b79a67b703d2c894bc4d9458c760e082fc42958.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:13:48 +0800
From: "yunfei.dong@...iatek.com" <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
CC: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...omium.org>,
"Tiffany Lin" <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Fritz Koenig <frkoenig@...omium.org>,
Irui Wang <irui.wang@...iatek.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
George Sun <george.sun@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5, 00/15] Using component framework to support multi
hardware decode
Hi Ezequiel,
Thanks for your suggestion.
On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 11:11 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> +danvet
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 23:58, Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > This series adds support for multi hardware decode into mtk-vcodec,
> > by first
> > adding component framework to manage each hardware information:
> > interrupt,
> > clock, register bases and power. Secondly add core thread to deal
> > with core
> > hardware message, at the same time, add msg queue for different
> > hardware
> > share messages. Lastly, the architecture of different specs are not
> > the same,
> > using specs type to separate them.
> >
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to introduce the component API in the
> media subsystem. It doesn't seem to be maintained, IRC there's not
> even
> a maintainer for it, and it has some issues that were never
> addressed.
>
> It would be really important to avoid it. Is it really needed in the
> first place?
>
> Thanks,
> Ezequiel
For there are many hardware need to use, mt8192 is three and mt8195 is
five. Maybe need more to be used in the feature.
Each hardware has independent clk/power/iommu port/irq.
Use component interface in prob to get each component's information.
Just enable the hardware when need to use it, very convenient and
simple.
I found that there are many modules use component to manage hardware
information, such as iommu and drm etc.
Do you have any other suggestion for this architecture?
Thanks
Yunfei Dong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists